Everything about Incarnation Christianity totally explained
The doctrine of the
Incarnation of
Christ is that the second person in the
Christian Godhead, also known as the Son or the
Logos (Word), "became flesh" when he was miraculously conceived in the womb of
the Virgin Mary. Alternatively, some Christian sects believe this to refer to the act of any heavenly being's incarnation in a human body, the specific Incarnation referring to that of the Son of God/God/Jesus.
In the Incarnation, the divine nature of the Son was united with human nature in one divine Person
Jesus Christ, who was both "truly God and truly man". The incarnation is commemorated and celebrated each year at the Feast of the Incarnation, also known as
Annunciation.
The doctrine is central to the traditional Christian faith as held by the
Roman Catholic and
Eastern Catholic Churches, the
Eastern Orthodox Church, the
Oriental Orthodox Church, the
Anglican Communion, and most
Protestants.
In the early Christian era there was considerable disagreement regarding the nature of Christ's Incarnation. Christians believed that he was the
Son of God. The exact nature of his Sonship, however, was contested.
Eventually, the doctrine of Christ being fully God and fully Man simultaneously was defined as doctrine by the Catholic Church, and all competing beliefs were defined as
heresies. The most well known of these are
Docetism, which stated that Jesus was a divine being that took on human appearance but not flesh,
Arianism which held that Christ was a created being, and
Nestorianism, which held that the Son of God, and the man, Jesus, shared the same body but retained two separate natures.
The most widely-accepted definitions of the Incarnation and the nature of Jesus were made by the early Catholic Church at the
Council of Ephesus in 431, the
Council of Chalcedon in 451, & the
First Council of Nicaea in 325. These councils declared that Jesus was both fully God, begotten from, but not created by the Father; and fully man, taking His flesh and human nature from the
Virgin Mary. These two natures, human and divine, were
hypostatically united into the one personhood of Jesus Christ.
The significance of the Incarnation has been extensively written-upon throughout Christian history, and is the subject of countless
hymns and
prayers. For instance, the
Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, as used by Orthodox and Byzantine Catholics, includes the "Hymn to the Only Begotten Son":
» O only begotten Son and Word of God,
Who, being immortal,
» deigned for our salvation
to become incarnate
» of the holy
Theotokos and ever-virgin Mary,
and became man without change;
» You were also crucified,
O Christ our God,
» and by death have trampled Death,
being One of the Holy Trinity,
» glorified with the Father and the Holy Spirit—
Save us!
The
Athanasian Creed contains what may be considered a comprehensive definition of the Incarnation.
History of beliefs
The incarnation was defined as a doctrine only after long struggles by early church councils. The Council of Nicaea (325) defined the deity of Christ against Arianism; the Council of Constantinople (381) defined the full humanity of the incarnate Christ against Apollinarianism; the Council of Ephesus (431) defined the unity of Christ's person against Nestorianism; and the Council of Chalcedon (451) defined the two natures of Christ, divine and human, against Eutyches. (Reginald H Fuller)
Fortuitous and Necessary Incarnation
The link between the Incarnation and the Atonement within systematic theological thought is complex. Within traditional models of Atonement, such as Substitution, Satisfaction or Christus Victor, it's essential that Christ be Divine in order for the Sacrifice of the Cross to be efficious, for our sins to be 'removed' and/or 'conquered'. In his work "The Trinity and the Kingdom of God",
Jurgen Moltmann differentiated between what he called a 'fortutious' and 'necessary' Incarnation. The latter speaks of the sole aim of the Incarnation as having a soteriological emphasis - that the Son of God became incarnate 'so that' He could save us from our sins. The former speaks of the Incarnation as a fulfilment of the love of God, and His desire to be present and living amidst us, to 'walk in the garden' with us. Moltmann favours 'fortuitous' incarnation primarily because to speak of an incarnation of necessity is to do an injustice to the life of Christ.
Moltmann's work, alongside other systematic theologians, opens up avenues of liberation
Christology, and the incarnation remains central to Christianity.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Incarnation Christianity'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://incarnation__christianity.totallyexplained.com">Incarnation (Christianity) Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |